Wednesday, July 28, 2021

Jermak in england opening

 a bit fragmentary, this one, but it's what I've done a bit of work on, because it came to me.


Chapter 1

 

“I suppose you’re some kind of Papist, Colonel Orzel?” asked the austere de facto leader of the British Parliament. He regarded the, to him, outlandishly dressed young man in amazement. The man wore a gaudy long coat of brocade in golds and browns and black, the split sleeves hanging entirely loose, not merely open with the wrists in the cuffs as some of the more fanciful fashions  of the west dictated. Under the hem of this garment might be seen trousers of considerable width, which neither fastened to the knee nor hung with beribboned or lace edges, but tucked into neat, soft boots. His dark hair was in a single lock which hung from the centre of his otherwise shaven head as he doffed the extraordinary fur hat to bow down to the ground, in a very different fashion to the western making of a leg. His sword .... was very workmanlike and large.

“My lord, I don’t ask your religion nor make any comment on it, and perhaps you will do me the courtesy to do likewise,” said Jermak. “We both love God; let us leave it at that, for I wager when we both stand before the Almighty, naked  and stripped of all human vanity, he will explain to us both how mortal men’s forms of worship fall short of His design, and we shall run, exposed and ashamed, on His mighty palm until we are forgiven the transgressions we repent, and permitted into Paradise. How can any mortal man frame the Almighty in such a way as to comprehend His will? To try to do so is arrogance, and pride, and a deadly sin.”

Cromwell stared. Then he nodded.

“Well spoken, young man; I hear the sincerity in your voice. I like a man who knows his own mind and is not afraid to speak it; your king has chosen well.”

Jermak hid a grin that Prince Jeremi Wiśniowiecki had suggested his name to King Jan Kazimierz, to get Jermak out of the way of Chmielnicki who had taken it into his head that Jermak was some kind of spymaster, because of his ward, Ninochka, sending intelligence to Jeremi.

“I’m a plain, blunt man, my lord, and I believe in plain, blunt speaking,” said Jermak.

“Good; I shall like you the more for it,” said Cromwell. “Your wife, as I understand, is the child of a Royalist.”

“Nominally,” said Grace. “My father, Charles Greville, believed firmly in the divine right of Charles Greville, and it got him poisoned by a Russian Prince. I am a believer in the Royal Commonwealth of Poland-Lithuania, but as a native English speaker, I am of use to my husband. We elect our kings in Poland, from those eligible, which seems more sensible than strict primogeniture. I knew both the deposed king’s young sons, and unless they’ve improved, I wouldn’t trust either of them with the running of more than a whelk stall in Billingsgate.”

A rare smile ghosted across Cromwell’s face.

“They teach you to be forthright in Poland,” he said.

“We’re Polish Cossacks; the word ‘Cossack’ means free man,” said Grace. “In its literal interpretation, not the freed-man of ancient Rome, who was a freed slave. We have a patron in Prince Jeremi Wiśniowiecki, who put forward our names as ambassadors, but for mutual loyalty only. We named our eldest for him.”

“There are others logged as your children who are surely too old for either of you to be parents to?”

“Our adopted children; yes,” said Jermak. “The Tatars raid, and seize young people for slaves. Sadly, many communities will not take them back, declaring them dead, because they cannot cope with the trauma such youngsters have been through. Even those not deflowered. We were in a position to rescue a number. One community took their own back; another ... did not. We split them between my Uncle Osyp and his English wife and ourselves, and also the orphaned daughter of the szlachcic ... the lord ... of the lands I inherited. Kamila and Alexandra are both fourteen. They are adequate warriors and can take care of themselves. They wish to be as martial as my wife and aunt, who learned to be warriors through your civil war.”

“Women have no place in war,” said Cromwell.

“Tell that to the rapacious soldiers who overrun cities raping, looting and burning,” said Grace.

“My men do not do that.”

“My lord, you are a strong warlord like Prince Jeremi. Not all are,” said Grace, dryly. “I can defend my lord’s lands at need, and my son, and our adopted daughters.”

She did not mention that she disliked Prince Jeremi intensely.

She disliked Cromwell intensely too.

 

 

 

 

14 comments:

  1. Jermak in england


    Yeaahhhh for the title!!!🤗🤗🤗

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. not entirely sure where I'm going with this, but I had the scene with Cromwell - before he is Lord Protector - pop into my head, and knew I had to write it.
      It would be fun to think think that the Parliamentarians borrowed the word 'Commonwealth' from Jermak and Grace discussing the Rzeczpospolita, wouldn't it?

      Delete
    2. the Commonwealth and the Lord Protector were declared in 1651 when various incarnations of Parliament had faffed about uselessly. Charles I was executed in Jan 49 and it's the back end of 48. I thought Jermak might visit the king.

      Delete
  2. Jedrek and Grace! Yes!

    Loved the outsider's (and parochial) description of Jedrek!

    > My father, Charles Greville, believed firmly in the divine right of Charles Greville, and it got him poisoned by a Russian Prince

    *snickers*

    > She disliked Cromwell intensely too

    He seems to have had that effect, doesn't he?

    Lovely start!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. hehe thank you, yes, Cromwell is a narrow fellow.

      Grace has no filial piety left lol...

      As far as I can see, with personal leanings towards the Parliamentarians, all the leaders of the period were douche-bags.

      Delete
  3. So Cromwell thinks his men are saints? I thought he was a general who really went to war... so he is either naive or hypocritical. I know about the siege of Basing House (1645) when the Parliamentary army slaughtered the garrison and Royalist/Catholic refugees, looted and burned the castle.
    I can understand/sympathize with Parliamentarian political ideals but not with the Puritan extremists of the era.
    This is a really intriguing story, I have wished for some of your Polish characters to interact with the English in England.
    I just realized how Hassling the Scot in The Deluge (the one who fell in love with Olenka in her captivity) could have come to be a mercenary officer on the Continent fleeing the conflicts at home.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think he thinks them saints, but he believes them to be disciplined - theoretically the New Model Army hanged looters and rapists. Theory doesn't always go with actuality.
      And yes, I'm with you on that; the king was spendthrift and introduced taxes willy-nilly, ship-tax being the last straw, and he did believe in the divine right of kings. Or as the satirical history '1066 and all that' puts it, the Royalists were Wrong But Wromantic and the Parliamentarians were Right But Repulsive.
      I hope I'll get on with Wojciech in England as well, when he and Irenka surprise some highwaymen for a very short while.
      Yes, I was reflecting on Hassling as well, and when I wrote Dawid Fraiters. G.A. Henty wrote a book called The Lion of the North, somewhat earlier, in which Scots mercenaries go to fight for Gustavus Adolphus, but the copy I picked up has horribly small print so I haven't read much of it yet.

      Delete
    2. I can very well imagine Cromwell trying to enforce this kind of discipline but I doubt he could always succeed (I recently read Heyer's The Spanish Bride with a similar looting/raping situation after the successful siege of Badajoz - Wellington is rather more cool and resigned about the realities of war and bloodthirst, allowing them free rein for some time then orders them to stop and withdraw the soldiers and enforces it with gallows)

      Delete
    3. And also, (to the best of my understanding) the parliamentarians were right in the beginning but they turned to being dictatorial too (and putting the army generals into the power of leading the country which doesn't usually go well for the country) so lost the moral high ground.

      Delete
    4. Wellington was a realist ... I've pondered deeply on what turns ordinary men into monsters, and I can only conclude that too much killing in war numbs the conscience as well as the senses and erodes the sense of moral certainties; it damages the soul, the humanity. Strictly enforced discipline can help some men to retain their self-worth in eschewing such, I think, but not all.

      Delete
    5. the second came in while I was writing ...
      They did, they became as much despots as any king. And as you say, we see regularly in banana republics how well putting generals in power works [or colonels if we look at Argentina]
      the whole period was a mess, Charles II shaped up enough to leave most things to his advisors, James II ... well James is why there's a pirate genre. I don't have a lot of time for any of the Stuarts, but England was not ready for a military junta or a commonwealth.

      Delete
  4. It should be "Orzeł" instead of "Orzel", although I doubt an Englishman would be able to pronounce "rz" and "ł". It should be "Aleksandra" instead of "Alexandra".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I doubt Cromwell would get anywhere near it. I can make a feature of that, though:
      “I suppose you’re some kind of Papist, Colonel Or-zell?”......."
      “It’s Orzeł, my lord. Eagle, it means....."

      silly of me.

      Delete